HomeНаука и техникаRelated VideosMore From: Wisdom Land

Deep Ocean: Lost World Of The Pacific Part 1 - David Attenborough Documentary HD

2946 ratings | 433952 views
An underwater adventure in search of living fossils. The island of New Guinea in the Pacific Ocean sits on the equator, where immediately next to a richly-colored coral reef, a sharp underwater cliff drops down to 1,000 meters. A long-awaited exploration down the little known depths of this tropical sea is finally about to start. NHK has teamed up with eminent marine biologist Mark Erdmann, discoverer of the coelacanth in Indonesia. The spherical transparent submarine, which successfully captured the world’s first moving images of a giant squid in its natural habitat, is used as the team encounters true living fossil species one after another. During their last dive, in the darkest depths of caves in the deep-sea cliff, the crew encounters a huge, unknown exotic fish… Narrated by Sir David Attenborough. For this shoot, the submarine was equipped with a cutting-edge 4K camera, for pristine images. Join the film crew on an exciting adventure into a deep sea never before seen by humans, captured on six cameras shooting multi-angles, creating a breath-taking underwater documentary. Part 1: The Lost World Of The Pacific The same submarine which successfully captured the world’s first moving images of a giant squid in its natural habitat is used for exploring the deep sea cliffs off the coast of New Guinea. The team encounters true living fossil species one after another. Join this exciting deep sea adventure!
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (446)
Bryan McKnight (7 hours ago)
What's that you say? Sir David Attenborough?! Yes, please. 'Nuff said.
Tony Castro (22 hours ago)
Imagine everything hiding from the light...
John Jones (5 days ago)
This 80 million, 100 million, billion years old bullshit is ridiculousness... what does anyone have that they know is even 10 thousand years old??? What is being compaired in carbon dating??? Consider this... the 1300's were only 700 years ago... a far cry from even 10 thousand years... the number one million is extremely incomprehensible to the human mind... you all do know that 90 percent of science is theroy right??? And probably 90 percent deception also...
John Jones (5 days ago)
Not to take away from the awesomeness of the fish and other sea creatures... I will watch part two also... I have an open mind, which is why I question the reality of things being a billion years old and a million light years away... 👍😎👍
David's Zoo (6 days ago)
2:30 (0-o)
Sandra Molina (16 days ago)
It so butiful
ElizaMoon Gacha (16 days ago)
I watched this in science like 5 days ago
Nick Comments (18 days ago)
Them : starts going to the deep Me : Alexa play Jurassic Park soundtrack
Oscar Villarreal (22 days ago)
Chris Reyes (23 days ago)
https://youtu.be/TODZQ7_7UOs?t=60 the official name: Whatthefuckisthat
WuzNab (23 days ago)
Guess you can say they were under a lot of pressure.
Sleepy Time (24 days ago)
imagine farting in the sub
Guy does Random things (23 days ago)
Sleepy Time you would die
KookieArmy (27 days ago)
is it just me or the background music sounds like Harry Potter song
Janna Sigua (24 days ago)
Yeaahhhh the harry potter background musics in the earlier movies. Some parts are so similar! Maybe they used the same pieces?
Lunies (28 days ago)
Lol they tried to google it xD
Billy Chai (1 month ago)
im glad that i watched this video
Brian Halstead (1 month ago)
Billions and billions wow, In the beginning God created....
Frost Rain (1 month ago)
This is Ocean Elon Musk :D
thedisturbedpriest (1 month ago)
that guys right nostril has been stretched so much from all the snorting coke
NebTheWeb (1 month ago)
I wonder how that leaf got in that cave (52:04)
Budi Sugiawan (1 month ago)
3:44 raja empat milik bangsa indonesia bukan new guinea
Budi Sugiawan (1 month ago)
2:31 raja empat milik bangsa indonesia bukan milik new guinea
Budi Sugiawan (1 month ago)
Raja empat tetorial republik indonesia not new guinea or other.
Brenten Ross (2 months ago)
Less people have been to the bottom of the sea then to space but we have so much more video of the bottom of the see why is that.......
Nouras Elias (2 months ago)
Haha, yea brother I second your vote for more HQ media on that subject. I would like you to try something tonight and reply back to satisfy my curiosity. I believe it has to be the immense distances that degrades quality. That I am sure of just by looking at photos and zooming on objects in the distance. When using a camera that I know takes HQ pictures. What I was wondering is if anyone else notices when it is really dark; if their vision seems to have a grainy appearance. I notice it personally when it is almost pitch black. Edit: I do not mean camera btw. I mean your literal vision. You know with your "gelatinous orbs" haha
Brenten Ross (2 months ago)
But we have so many Sat's in space with cams and on the moon and Mars but just grainy vids it's a it funny but yes I agree I know there is a lot of R. O. V. But still we should be looking at moon dust in 1080p by now lol
Nouras Elias (2 months ago)
Alot of remotely operated submarines that are tethered to research ships to get video, samples, data, etc...
NOT Blitzwing (2 months ago)
this man is the next jesus
Neurotic Arts (2 months ago)
Life on earth has so many shapes... so many ways of feeding and adapting... - fair to say, some aliens might look exactly like lifeforms on earth
Bean Dar (2 months ago)
Boring!! We need to be exploring rocks in space not undiscovered species in the deep sea. 👎👎👎
WuzNab (3 months ago)
Bru what if you hear a crack, in the dome of the submarine.
Janna Sigua (24 days ago)
Holy shit. Imagine the water pressure😩
James Nichols (2 months ago)
That would be my biggest fear.
Lewis Castles-Hyson (3 months ago)
Gotta love this scientist! The passion he has is wonderful to witness. You sir are an inspiration.
Toni Charles (1 month ago)
I love the Ocean, was interested in being an oceanographer at one time in my life. I would love to have the position of being the narrator of these wonderful documentaries, therefore being such a part of it that my dream of being an oceanographer would at least be partly fulfilled.
Sinistadropbear (4 months ago)
Nobody will ever come even close to this man... everything he does is gold!!😀😀🤔😎
NebTheWeb (1 month ago)
His brother would say..."Welcome to Jurassic Park"
Pizza Cuber (4 months ago)
I'm wondering how that white fish tastes like
JESSE B (4 months ago)
I love adventures like this video!!!
Wayne From the U.K (5 months ago)
What a great video but I knew it would be as soon as I saw the name Sir David Attenborough. A truly great man. Well enough about God, (sorry, i meant Sir David lol), this video was amazing. I'd love to be able to go down in one of those submersible and explore the deep. They do say that we know more about space than we do about our oceans and that's a shame. The creatures that live down there look out of this world. Wayne (From the U.K)
LMatt 88 (5 months ago)
Wow how much of the world we dont know
Niko Andrikopoulos (6 months ago)
The Water Nature is so Wonderful!
Dustin Schoemaker (6 months ago)
Maybe that's proof that the earth isn't as old as people keep saying. I'm just saying it seems like they just throw a number out there. This fosel is 100million years old, and this fosel is 800million years old ect. Look down here these sea erchants look just like our 4billion year old sea erchant fosels. And I'm not buying carbon dating bullshit i don't believe it at all.
Jules Dussault (6 months ago)
Was using the mic and the mic didn’t write the weird thing was said apologize sorry should I use a the keyboard
Jules Dussault (6 months ago)
Yap it was a joke far u
Mike Rotch (6 months ago)
27:00 you need to fire your music guy
Guy does Random things (23 days ago)
Mike Rotch ?
Frances Lambert (6 months ago)
Thank you so much for pts. 1 & 2. I missed them every time they were aired on t.v. It was great seeing the "jelly nose" fish.
Peasant Gaming (6 months ago)
22:58 your'e reaction when u won a grammy's award
marshall de corazón (6 months ago)
GREAT DOC! Obviously this perpetually open-mouthed biologist was in the navy, army or played football in college with his constant exclamations of 'we nailed him'. And his often calling them weird fish. yes, when you go down 500m deep into the ocean, one usually finds 'Weird Fish'!! ( Also a great song by RADIOHEAD= "WEIRD FISH" :) )
Pacero (6 months ago)
Why is he speaking, when his wife, theoretically , was the one who found it? Of course, the fisherman was there before. "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's".
panjualede (6 months ago)
the creatures haven't changed since the fossil records where created, i wonder why?
Edana Schmidt (6 months ago)
LOL .. their world wasn't lost .. humans just hadn't been there to muck it up for them. 😉
Chobits Computer (6 months ago)
there i living
busybillyb33 (6 months ago)
43:15 Oops sorry. *closes door*
Rich (6 months ago)
I'm not sure, but at the 52:06 mark of the film, it looks like there's a leaf! lying on the floor, if it is one....how did that get there?
Guy does Random things (23 days ago)
Exposed this film was a April fools prank it was a film set and that fish is cgi that leaf probably fell on the prop
True Wyckoff (6 months ago)
Darth Synmor (6 months ago)
If you think about it these Island People live atop a gigantic mountain range..
Skrallizar (6 months ago)
Imagine if they did this kind of expedition with today's technology, or next year!
Paula G Whyte (6 months ago)
If only I didn't have such terrible claustrophobia I would LOVE to do this!!
Geraldine Butterfly (6 months ago)
This Narrator is everything
Ljubisa Nm naumov (6 months ago)
e morgent od meteora nije sigurnoooooooooooo
Belinda A Martin (6 months ago)
David Attenborough & video stunning . Music hideous - sounds like docu music from the 50’s
Chrisfragger1 (6 months ago)
Why anyone likes this guy is a question I would LOVE to be answered... IF he had his way he would literally kill every human being on the planet.
Val Mo (6 months ago)
NEW GAME: Having a shot each time you hear M. Attenbourough say SEALACAMP !!!
Matthew Smith (7 months ago)
2:30 a wild paradise that has been untouched ? Paradise my ars, anywhere that hasnt been touched by the western world is complete sht hole
Thomas V. (7 months ago)
That Disney music though, Jesus Christ
Remie Nervar (7 months ago)
wow is so cool
Dust's Animal Jam Guide (7 months ago)
Samir Dave (7 months ago)
Thank You For Your Greatest Achievement Moments Sharing With The World. With Best Regards To You & Your Team For Your Work That Give More Knowledge & Eye Open To All That We Are Very Small In All Another Animal They Survive Without Damage Environment. If They Survive In Very Hard Environment In Very Easy Way So Why We Don't Try Like This. One New Think - That If You Are Slow You Survive More. If You Go Fast You Win Race But Survive Chance Less. The Creature - Elephant, Whale , Tortoise Etc.. Thanks Again. With Best Wishes To All.
Bintang Bahagia (7 months ago)
i know this place in my country.. im from indonesia ... and im very shock i eat this fish every week ....
Jules Dussault (7 months ago)
I don’t know why scientists supposedly scientists talks about evolution and involving it’s so dumb of not see a monkey change to a man yet or fish to a man or anything else animal were created To their own kindI says Jehovah the Creator of heaven and earth
Mike Rotch (6 months ago)
Jules Dussault did you really call someone else dumb? Look at what you “wrote”. It’s nonsense....if you can’t put together one coherent sentence I don’t think I’ll believe anything you say...
Amado Harbov (7 months ago)
the jelly nose fish does not new fish it founded at rivers and Nile at Sudan and Egypt and it electric fish it has many fats more than meat
Trippy J (7 months ago)
as soon as i was about to go to sleep, rip
Frederic Yang (7 months ago)
I love nautiluses
Manu M (7 months ago)
Where do I find part 2 or when does it get published?
Wildberry Citrus (7 months ago)
28:34 Was that real?
Jason WB (7 months ago)
Mr. Attenborough, 92 years old and still rocking. He must really love his work.
Thatonedeepseaguy Films (7 months ago)
42:47 I think that’s a jellynose fish.
REB Bal (7 months ago)
Thanks for the video. Very well done. Very informative.
jerrieson eustaquio (7 months ago)
is that a statue on 54:39 ????
aminluqman hakim (7 months ago)
feel like i'm watching Hayao Miyazaki film: ost feel a bit like how Hayao Miyazaki will direct it
That because the music was scored by the same guy who does Studio Ghibli films. Joe Hisaishi
Pia Salvato (7 months ago)
What an amazing documentary!!! Love Sir David Attenborough!!! Classiest of them all!!!!!
hot rod daddy (7 months ago)
only 3 of the oceans have been explored.. we know more about the moon than we do the ocean.
videoclipits (7 months ago)
It will soon be past tense...lived. Unchecked human growth and ignorance will eventually kill everything in the sea.
Joseph 1960 (7 months ago)
your late.... China already doing a clean up of ocean floor....
Brian A Davis (7 months ago)
A single species shouldn't be able to reproduce 100 million years; theoretically wouldn't a species succumb to genetic entropy?
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
@Brian A Davis Exactly. Only now we're making those who would normally not be able to have kids able to have them. We're stopped natural selection and breeding is no longer a matter of being 'fit'. Worse socioeconomic's actually promote breeding among those who shouldn't at the expense of those who should.
Brian A Davis (7 months ago)
@Lensflare Deviant From an evolutionary point of view, if you live to reproduce; you are the fittest. Evolution does not care if you think someone is...or is not, fit.
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
@Brian A Davis There is no difference from your genes perspective but the process are diametrically opposed in terms of how they work and their final result. Survival of the fittest is the natural way, survival of the unfit is the artificial way. Calling natural selection and artificial selection the same because they both involve 'selection' is such an over simplification it defies wonder. It's not the selection that is important but how that selection is made.
Brian A Davis (7 months ago)
@Lensflare Deviant P.S. from your genes perspective, there is no difference between natural selection and artificial selection; its all selection. Survival of the fit... as you would say.
Brian A Davis (7 months ago)
@Lensflare Deviant You certainly can discard it. However, I find it reasonable that all things must experience entropy (Lynch calls it genetic drift). Lets say: your and my alleles no longer replicate themselves after 80 - 100 years (about 1200 cycles); it follows that our sex cells will no longer replicate and our spices die out ... maybe 1200 cycles (aka generations).
Department of Thought (7 months ago)
Absolutely fantastic film. DA is the best natural history presenter ever. Obviously the Japanese have a specimen of the jelly nose in a jar. That's what they do; kill everything in the sea. I can't think of another nation that causes as much damage to ocean fauna as the Japanese.
Joe D (7 months ago)
Damn it's a shame that Sulowesi just got destroyed, looked a good place.
Green (7 months ago)
10:48 dude double checks that the top hatch is closed properly. Lmao.
Russell Payne (7 months ago)
where does all the money come from to fund these junkets.
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
Science and research foundations (publicly and privately funded), government grants, university grants, etc.
Meria Johnfroe (7 months ago)
Why may I, ask do they dive at night! What if something happens wrongfully! How will they help them! Strange except for taking pic at night for many fish will come out at darkness!
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
They're hunting for a fish that only comes out a night.
Lady Bucket (7 months ago)
37:30 the way they scoot around is just absolutely adorable!
Okami no Tamashi (7 months ago)
documentaries about nature: *exist* religious people: GAWD!
James Robert (7 months ago)
True North (7 months ago)
This video was absolutely fantastic! Thank you so much for uploading this and allowing me on the expedition from the comfort of my living room.
Uopfy Ofyfy (7 months ago)
nature at its finest
Dave MacDonald (7 months ago)
The asteroid theory has been thoroughly debunked. Even the Alvarez brothers are warbling. Intense volcanism due to India colliding into Asia caused the extinction which lasted over a thousand years, not overnight. The pebble that splashed into the ocean doesn't even line up with the fossil records. It's a Carl Sagan cold war anti-nuclear myth. It also shows that no matter what we do to avoid green house emissions, every time a volcano farts the world gets warmer. Like Trump says, we're all screwed anyway so lets keep driving Hummers, eating beef, and burning coal.
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
@Dave MacDonald I have never said there was no volcanic activity nor did I ever say it wasn't a contributing factor. I have only been saying that the impact theory has not been discarded or refuted in favor of any other theory single theory. This is just another example of your interpreting (or making up) facts that suit yourself and shows how you continue to play fast and loose with the truth. Since there is lots of evidence that both happened the current theories are utilizing both events. You have discarded that in favor of advocating for only one. "Anyway, even a year is too long an extinction period and we know it was longer than that." this statement is confusing. Extinction events tend to take generations to fully manifest why you would say a year is to long is.. baffling. Further your assertion that celestial events are somehow not part of the natural evolution of the planet is utter nonsense. We have evidence of many impact events including many very large ones. As for the rest.. Pot meet Kettle almost everything there I have already demonstrated applies far more to you than me. You shame yourself continuously.
Dave MacDonald (7 months ago)
You're funny. I like you. You'd be fun to get going over a drink. Maybe we could even play a game of asteroids. The flatearthers were actually the ones who held to an incorrect theory that the evidence so obviously contradicted. Nowhere in the 14th century literature was there any contradiction of the heliocentric universe accepted by the establishment until someone pointed out the obvious. Anyway, even a year is too long an extinction period and we know it was longer than that. And now you're admitting it might be volcanism triggered by an impact. Of course a butterfly's wings could have triggered the volcanism, but no one would say a butterfly brought down the dinosaurs. And if you're saying that it doesn't have to be all one or another, I would say that was wavering from the Alvarez position which of course they have never wavered from. Occam's razor, which is a simpler explanation: a process which occurs every day, or a celestial event. Love your simplistic, arbitrary, dishonest, pandering, quibbling, defective, superior, self-serving, idiotic, shameful, cowardly friend.
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
@Dave MacDonald The fossil record shows the extinction took.. time. How long exactly can not be determined but I would agree with the idea of hundreds or even thousands of years. This doesn't rule out a impact in anyway. The changes made by the impact (including the triggering of volcanism) didn't all take place in a single day. It was a lively day but your appreciation of how the impactor extinction works is very simplistic. The entire ecosystem went haywire. There was massive losses across the species spectrum including among marine vertebrates so where you got the notion that it didn't is beyond me. You're stating that the impact theory is wrong is simply not supported anywhere except by you. I can't find any published sources that say that it's a theory that has be discredited or discarded so it's appears to be a figment of your mind. You also seem married to the whole notion is that is has to be either one or the other which again isn't the opinion of the scientific community that I can find. More and more it's sounding like you simply found a source that convinced you and you've decided arbitrarily. That's dishonest. Again. Worse this is flat earther logic where the only 'truth' is that which panders to the belief with everything else being discarded. In matters with things so far in the past nothing is so cut and dried especially the ability to date any of the events with any precision. It's starting to feel that your quibbling more out of a wish to be 'right' more than 'correct' which is again the same defective logic system employed by the flat earth community. Lastly if writing a reply is shameful why have comment sections at all? Why comment at all? To let dishonest statements stand unchallenged is your idea of superior? That's yet more self-serving logic and genuine idiocy. All you want is to be insulated from any contradiction of your OPINION. An opinion you shamefully try and pass off as fact. So you've moved into both cowardly and shameful.
Dave MacDonald (7 months ago)
What's shameful is a person who purports to be intelligent even writing replies on YouTube. Anyway, the fossil record shows the extinction occurred over the course of a thousand years, the time period over which the volcanic activity was at its worst. End of story, the asteroid theory is wrong. The marine life that should have been affected by the collision the most didn't die. End of story, the asteroid theory is wrong. The elements found in SOME areas of the world AROUND the same time can be explained by volcanic activity. I'm sorry, I didn't intend mockery and insult so much as humour. If you don't appreciate my sense of humour I'll refrain in future discussions. My diatribe does seem to have hit a nerve though, even if I am a dishonest, ignorant, self-exposed fool (and a troll ;) ).
Lensflare Deviant (7 months ago)
​@Dave MacDonald So much contradictory data? Such as? I suspect you know far less than you claim and your understanding of the situation is flawed. At least thanks to me you were able to at least get the relationship of the Alvarez's correct. The rest is still you just claiming one theory is more accepted than another because it's self serving not that you actually know anything. _"The rest of you should know that people defend a position more vehemently when they realize they were wrong."_ which explains why your reply starts with veiled insults and continues to mockery? The weakest for of debate from the weakest position. You both expose yourself and make a fool of yourself in a single step. Shameful.
Yong Keng Ashton Lim (7 months ago)
Captivated by his voice. Thank you, Sir.
jaco kruger (7 months ago)
at 14:50, its over 400 million years dated and no change what so ever to it? WTF, evolution get your fucking lazy ass over there and change that fucking lilly NOW!!!!! evolution needs time to show or notice change, you are embarassing our scientist that carbon dated that shit, and we said time is needed to see change, fuck you evolution
andy d (7 months ago)
One thing would be on my mind in that sub.What if it implodes??
lassisvulgaris (7 months ago)
It has probably been pressure-tested in advance....
Jon McBurney (7 months ago)
Amazing nature
Oh DeAr! (7 months ago)
what if...
David Buschhorn (7 months ago)
14:46 Yikes. That looks like an alien ready to clamp onto your face and lay eggs down your throat.
SmokeStack (7 months ago)
that new fish was probably blinded by ur bright ass lights ur blasting in it's eyes.
Erik Iacopelli (7 months ago)
That would have scared the FUCK outta me, Fucking turn my head n that HUGE fish is right in my grill like WATS UP BITCH?!?! lol
Erik Iacopelli (7 months ago)
looks like a animals spine crawling away lol
jerry pfaff (7 months ago)
200 million years ago, show evidence please, oh than its 400 million years
lassisvulgaris (7 months ago)
To understand science, you need a certain level of education, mainly within biology, physics, mathematics and chemestry. In you case, understanding of "radioactive decay" could be helpfull....
Rick Quest (7 months ago)
Why would a fish like this have eyes when it's total darkness this far below sealevel and is clearly blind? Isn't it like backwards evolution?
lassisvulgaris (7 months ago)
@Rick Quest That is what I said, or did I state that enivironment adapts? We are not born with everything, but evolution takes a long time. So, again, cave-dwellers have lost the use of eye-sight, though many of them have eyes. Many birds have wings, but they can't fly. Probably because there are no predators, or they are big and fast. You might call it "backwards evolution", since evolution is as much trial and error, as it is adaptation. But if you call evolution dogmatic, you have not understood the principles of it.....
Rick Quest (7 months ago)
@lassisvulgaris Are you listening to yourself? You're saying at first we were all born with "everything" and through the years lost use of the things we no longer use? Ridiculous. We adapt to our environment not the other way around. The dogma needs to end now.
lassisvulgaris (7 months ago)
No. Cave-dwellers, like fish, insects, and mammals, have eyes, but are blind. That proves evolution, since they lost the use of un-necessary organs....
test blustacks (7 months ago)
Random and inappropriate background music. Why?
Serve Almighty w\ guitar (7 months ago)
I fail to understand why they are looking for a fish that they know exists, and has been seen and caught bye the locals.
Mike Rotch (6 months ago)
Serve Almighty w\ guitar because it hasn’t been caught on film in its environment.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.