Conclusion: There is no safe way I am aware of to do this without some risk, either to the father getting ground through the divorce machine, or to the children. Thoughts on this video or any personal experiences dealing with this? Post a comment below.
Channel Sponsor: You're showering anyways, so why not buy handmade soap from a sponsor that supports the creation of my content. Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned at the end of the video here: http://bit.ly/2jQEZbz
If you want to join us at the 21 convention this fall, you can grab a ticket here: http://team.21university.com/78641/6171
Make a reach.me request: https://www.reach.me/RichardCooper
Get 1 on 1 coaching with me: https://clarity.fm/richardcooper
Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EntrepreneursinCars
All you can do is mitigate the potential loss, don't get married, don't live in a state with common law marriage, don't link your finances to her in any way, live in a rented property (because she'll get you kicked out of it when you break up if you have kids).
Yes, there is going to be some financial pain, it's inevitable, not only will there be child support, you will also have to help her out if she is destitute for the sake of the kids. The damage, however, should be limited, of course if she is completely financially incompetent then you have to go for main custody.
For the most part - we get screwed by CSA child support agency and the Family Court system here in Australia too if you’re a male.
One can get 50/50 custody, where it’s agreed upon (that is, no maintenance payment by either party), but it’s the exception not the rule.
My advice to this situation is mentor a niece / nephew / godson or daughter and stay away from the system that can potentially kill the human spirit.
There’s an old saying; you have to pay the piper..
Stop, look, listen and think before doing anything stupid!! Rant over 😂🏄🏽♂️💦🇦🇺
I've watched a lot of your content as well as lots of others' of similar genre and yours is clearly the best. Quite simply because although you've been through the divorce and legal system for access to your children, you give such measured responses to these questions raised. You're more than entitled to be bitter and twisted but you keep it logical and don't force any one opinion on people, you leave food for thought. Others of similar content are definitely bitter and have been scorned or burned by women somewhere along the line and their attitudes are questionable.
He can adopt a kid . so he won't have to deal with a women.
I am gonna do it later on. There is no point to live with a women. ( sex? I can rent a body) ( have kids? I can adopt) ( emotional affection ? They don't care so don't waste your time.)
most of these guys can't find the diamond in the rough... Hahaha... They blame the system or the woman for making a bad decision. No one told you to inseminate them if they don't meet at the check lists.... Hahaha.... Problem is there's a lot of vaginas but not many winners, so finding the winner is like finding the pin in the haystack. Thus you want to be alpha to the core so you have more options to choose from in the quest of finding the one that checks off all the boxes.
Hey Rich. Things won’t ever change because the criminal justice system makes way too much money off of men being incarcerated. The court system would rather push rational men towards irrational behavior and have us jailed instead of helping. A woman can marry you. Spit out a couple kids. Get you to buy a house. Cheat on you and then divorce you and take everything you’ve worked for. For any reason. The judge will roll his eyes and give her everything no matter what you say. It’s the bleeding truth and we need to let these young guys know the truth. Marriage ain’t worth your life.
Lol pathetic that people are paying this guy 75-100 dollars for 5 minutes worth of advice. Even more pathetic that this guy is reeling in vulnerable people and essentially stealing money from these poor people. Look at all the endorsement this guy has in his descpition. It's just a money grab people
I was thinking about this dilema for past 4y. One of the solutions is surogacy.
1st) It's legal in India and will run between 10-20k USD. Then you can move anywhere in the world. (watch the episode of VICE on this subject)
2nd) You will need help raising the kid and a women "soft rolmodel" till the age of 13-14 In every culture this is the time when child goes from mother to father. In my opinion hiring well educated young full time sitter is the best way. It will run you between 4-6k USD a month in US outside of CA and NY. or 25% less in europe outside of London. It's not that expensive. Lifetime sitters were very popular in Europe not that long ago. I know several friends raised this way. Bond between sitter, child and (you) will create artificial family and the effect will be good.
I expect a lots of criticism. Lots of beta snowflakes out there. You ask for solution this is one
If you don’t care if it’s your child biologically, of course there is adoption. But what I think mgtow guys overlook is foster care. First, you can state you would only want a male. Second, if you don’t want diapers/infants, you can say school aged, etc.
Third, the government actually pays you money to help offset the costs of raising these kids. Fourth, you are still mgtow. Sadly very few of these kids are reunited with their biological families. Sometimes after a couple years of knowing the child you can even adopt. It’s certainly not something to do in a whim, but there’s no guarantees with any child, including your own. It would be something to consider.
So many boys are in need of positive male role models. You could have a huge impact on a boys life. If foster care is too much of a commitment, there’s big brother programs.
Should I be surprised that not One of these men responded in kind?!
Hmmmm. They want to have biological children! I'm convinced! They want to have a family. This is just a place for them to vent whenever they feel the need.
Hi, I just found your channel, I just wanted to say hello and thank you for vlogging. Lot's of people comment on many channels about statistics. I'm writing to tell you I'm one of those individuals that makes up some statistics. 51 year old male, after a thirty two year relationship I started to get healthy, asked my wife to return to full time employment, six months later she claimed abuse. I was evicted from my home and have not seen my daughter in 9 months. My case is before the NH Supreme Court, see the July docket. Silver Bullet victim and survivor. I'm considering starting a vlog to help others understand the journey. Thank you
I avoided the major bullets by establishing joint (not shared) custody at birth and a private support/access agreement, not marrying her, owning my own home prior and then jointly owing another property where she and children lived and she has educations/skills to earn her own money (or better but rare is wealthier than yourself). You will find that many women are open to this arrangement once you're upfront about it.
There are a lot of women who want children and to own their home but do not possess the resources or have the options to do it on their own. My arrangement does not come without minor hassles and headaches but my legal rights as a parent are in place (health, education, residence, travel). My children's mother has been agreeable for the most part over the years mainly because upsetting the arrangement would be acting against her own interest.
you are coming at the breeding problem from the wrong premise. You have to come at it from the angle that you’re going to take the child and leave before she can do it to you.
Children don’t need a mother they develop normally without a mother, so you have to see the female as the incubator only, stop thinking of her as a mother. Stop thinking like a nice blue pilled simp and that means mentally overcoming your male weakness of compassion. You use her for breeding then you take the child and disappear. You have about a four year window before she does not need you and will start thinking about fucking you over and taking the child.
First start to set up your escape plan, then tell her everything she wants to hear, breed quickly one or 2 children, within 2 years, remember you have about 4 years before it’s too late to do the runner with the child.
Once you’re really to do the runner, disappear with the child and start your life. Remember it’s not illegal for a parent to take a child and just leave. If you’re worried about the police then do it with a lawyer and disappear but use the lawyer to notify the police and say it’s for the child’s safety, simply lie and apply for custody saying the child was in danger and make up some really good bull shit. You have to be a ruthless cunt just like a women will do to you.
You would have no hesitation shitting on another man if he was going to hurt your child so this is no difference, if you stay with her you know that the odds are against you and the mother will most likely abuse the child and deny you access, so its only you doing it first.
Women are not your friend, not your lover, they are a tool you use and then upgrade from. stop thinking tradition. Things will not get better, fairer, or go back to the good old days, that's an MRA fantasy. evolve to the new type of male and incorporate female behavior into your redpilled mind
The US, at least PA is starting to lean towards 50/50 split. Still very femme slanted though with child support and decisions, etc. I don't recommend it unless you can take the woman out of the picture beforehand. It's not a healthy situation for the kid though
From personal experience, there is no way to do it. The child, not the woman, has the right to the child support meaning that it doesn't matter if you have parental rights or not, you will always owe child support no matter what she does. She will eventually find someone else to move in with and you'll be funding their lifestyle through the child support. Even if you have split custody, the courts will generally rule that the man owes the women child support. Essentially, you'll be paying for some other guy to raise your child. Of all the guys I know that have full custody of their children, you can forget significant child support. One friend has full custody of three kids and she doesn't even pay enough to cover their school lunches. He makes under $60k/yr.
Edit: also forgot that even with a split, the mother will likely be able to qualify for more public assistance than you but the courts will make you pay for half of the bill that she's getting for free. Things like daycare, schooling, soccer practices, camp, doctors bills, etc. plus, chances are that she will be able to claim custody of the kids for tax purposes. Oh, and don't forget that child support works out to be 28% of your gross monthly income but you have to pay it with after tax dollars. She doesn't pay taxes on child support.
Safest way to have kids without getting married? Make sure you get full custody and she gives up her rights. It's not going to happen though
Think outside of the country. Hook up with an illegal chick or import her on a tourist visa. Knock her up and let her stay illegal while she gives birth to your child. The key is, never let her get legalized. She will hide behind you like a brick wall and do whatever you say. Trust me, I'd been illegal, nothing drills deeper into your mind than the thought that you are a second class citizen. She'll always feel your superiority and will be under your rule. My pal did it and he is happy.
There's no definitive stats on single fathers like there's definitive stats on single mothers. All we can go by is the impact of the father's absence or presence in the childs life. Based on those stats, I'm going the surrogate single father route. I'll accept that risk over marrying or pair bonding. By the way folks, Mexico would be the country to look for cheap surrogates. Don't let these super red pill dudes have you paying child support for 18 years.
About two years ago one of my really good friend (women) came to me with a proposition. She said "I'm 44 now and still could not find a partner. I'm not sure I even can have kids anymore but I would love to have at least one. You are my type. Would you make me pregnant? You don't have to pay child support or anything. I'm willing to sign a paper about that". It broke my heart. I told her that the child needs a father. and I don't think it's a good idea. I did not even want go into how risky to have a child over 40. And of course she could change her mind about the child support anytime.
This guys videos just keeps getting worse and worse... i used to listen to you back in the days when your videos had good content... now its all segue and ads... im no expert but your style and shift will lose you subs. Your channel will die if you dont churn out good content and lessen your segue(s)...
I can not understand why people still want children? Society will certainly not die out. Ask yourself why you want children? Do they have to fill an emotional void? I already knew at age 7 that I did not want children and I am so grateful that I listened to myself. I have all the time for myself and do not miss children. There is nothing as strong as a hormone, but put yourself over it. It will be your best choice ever to choose for yourself.
If we care about the civillisation our ancestors created we have to solve this problem. If Western men are afraid to breed while our governments keep importing the rest of the world we will lose the culture and civillisation.
More men in the manosphere need to pool our resources and find out how to keep the nations going while minimising the risk of divorce rape and women screwing up the lives of the children and turning them against us.
Do women EVER commit suicide after a divorce? Talk about a unicorn there, geesh. Men take all the burden in life. The current female primary order and gyno-centric laws would have never happened if women weren't allowed to vote. 80% emotional creatures being allowed to vote is like giving a 3rd grader keys to an M5 convertible while the parents are on vacation.
Jason Jay When I was in school I recall learning women actually “attempt” suicide more, but are more likely to take pills, that do not actually kill them. Men are more “successful” (hate using that word in relation to suicide), because they tend to use more violent methods.
There is not enough discussion, awareness of the sky rocketing suicide rate in men, particularly divorced men and/or veterans. It’s tragic. We all wear ribbons for breast cancer awareness. How about some ribbons and exposure for suicide prevention.
Depends on where you live, if common law exists or not.
Also depends on your woman not making any accusations on you to take the kids away and force you to pay child support.
Also I’m not 100% sure, but I think women can get you for your money when they leave work to birth your child. They can claim you forced them to limit their career prospects, and they are entitled to financial compensation.
My take: just bite the bullet and live with woman (there are decent one out there), having full family is good for kid AND guy (oh and for woman, I suppose), just try not letting her run (and ruin) Your life, also contacting lawyer before marriage and ANY huge financial decision (starting Your own business, buying house etc) may be good idea. Monsters are made, not born, she may try to rip You another hole IF it come to divorce.
TL:DR be The Man, don't get f* in the a*. That's a woman's job.
Let me give the solution guys : Be hypergamic just like they are. Don’t low date . UP FUCKING DATE! She has to make more money than u. That’s how u will get a chance to save your a** from this scam system.
Hi Richard, I have watched a lot of your videos and I like them a lot. Two topics to talk about:
1) In many of your videos you state that women are hypergamous "by nature." You imply that it is in the "biology" of the female to seek the highest status male. What is your opinion on social programming, you know, what women are taught by their parents and society? For example, mother to her daughter: "You should date a lawyer or a doctor, don't settle for anything less!" and so on...
2) (Immature) Women select partners based solely on their social status/wealth. This is the basis of their hypergamous nature; based on that criterion, they will search to find men who maximize its value. However, we also know that (immature) men select women based only on how hot they look. So women tend to select the highest social status males and men tend to select the most beautiful females. Couldn't we classify that behavior of men as hypergamous as well?
Yup, that's exactly my point. We men will try to get the most beautiful woman and marry her, at least that's what most guys do. I never said that male and female hypergamy are "identical." Suppose that social status and wealth is x and that beauty/attractiveness is y. Women want to maximize x and men want to maximize y when they want to have a partner. The strife to maximize only one variable is what makes hypergamy, hypergamy.
And yes, hypergamy serves better women than men. Beauty declines with age, however, wealth and social status can increase.
Female hypergamy is seeking the highest status man who can provide the most resources. But for men, we seek the most beautiful woman we can get? I’m not sure if that would be considered hypergamy...
Because unlike women, we wouldn’t branch swing as easily as they do. And plus we don’t receive anything “tangible” in our version of hypergamy.
When a woman exercises her hypergamy, she improves her tax bracket. When a man exercises his “hypergamy”, his wife just gets younger and looks better. It doesn’t really “help” him I guess.
You missed one possible situation. Being up front while dating, that you are looking for partner who wants to have kids, but tell them you are not willing to marry. But want to coparent. Then, you want to have a coparenting written agreement before getting pregnant. You may find some women are open to this. Generally they may fall into the over 35 category. This is a situation i am in. And it is working great. Plus best part of life for me has been seeing and being a part of raising my child. Worth it.
Living in Canada is like a god damn slavery nightmare. You'd have to be nuts to have kids in this screwy liberal country. If anything goes wrong in that marriage, it's total financial wipeout for you. They literally put 100% of the blame and risk on the men. If some guy comes home from work early and catches his wife blowing the plumber, guess what, he loses his house, kids, and gets slapped with support payments. What happens to her? She gets a nice payday and a monthly allowance, and is now free to bang as many men as she wants. Most white Canadian born women are not loyal either, the majority are feminists and they cheat, a lot. I wouldn't trust most of them. Their diet sucks and they don't take care of themselves, and the side effect of that is their brains are malnourished and inflamed, so they make crap decisions. You can't honestly expect someone brought up on empty calories like Kraft Dinner and Wonder Bread to have healthy brain function and make good choices.
This is an unsolvable problem. We will go extinct as a society. Societies that are patriarchal a will survive. This is one thing Islam has right because of the fundamental pre-programming of hypergamy. They are all defective by design.
Most men want sex and don’t want marriage or children. For this reason, girlfriends go out of their way to create the “accidentally on purpose” pregnancy with the boyfriend. They are betting a pregnancy will cause you to get married, and they still get money if you don’t. If you want children, just allow your girlfriend to “trick you”, have the baby, and pay the child support. A girlfriend has already selected you as worthy of children, which is why you are dating. Child support is manageable as long as you didn’t get married because you don’t have to split assets or pay alimoney. You also get the benefit of sharing the parenting, and is much less expensive than surrogacy. Typical child support is between $400-$500 a month if you make 45-50K salary, but it is income based. Most women respect the visitation rights in exchange for the money, and parental alienation is illegal. Having children out of wedlock has become common. This method has worked for me anyway.
I'm 57 years old. At approximately 32 years of age I felt an incredible urge to reproduce. Never found anyone who was worthy of my seed. Richard is right. If you get someone pregnant no matter where you will eventually take it in the ass. There's far too many people on this planet anyways and I really hate to see what the next 50 years will bring.
The only low risk option is to move to a country with marriage/divorce laws that favor men and encourage tight knit family bonds. The trade off is that you'll have a harder life in general due to a less developed economy. But keep in mind that those laws can always change 5 to 10 years from now due to western influence on foreign cultures.
Just think if you are a single guy now that is alone and has no kids and wants a woman and family but if feels so hard to find and get and you feel like you are missing something it sucks right.
But it feels way worse when you have nothing, govt forces you to hand over money and you cant see ya kids.
Biggest regret was making babies fucked my life hard. So much money lost and heart break.
Emotional cancer for men
Wait. This a catch 32 here. You can't get married, nor live with a woman together. At the same time 2 parents are required, living together, to raise functional humans in society.
So either humanity will become distorted as fuck (on an individual level), or the population will decrease. I feel like there's a bigger agenda in play here, lol.
Move overseas and find a foreign wife where her country's marriage laws are fair to men, She can't divorce rape you! Live and raise your family in her country can't do that? then Stay Single and don't bring her to the West!
How about setting up a living trust, where you personally own nothing but the trust, and the trust owns nothing but a C corp. All holdings are then held in the C corp. That would put you two arms lengths away from anyone grabbing your assets. Oh, and pay yourself a very modest income for day to day expenses.
Now, I've thought about this same issue, and have came to one possible conclusion. You hire a female, live in employee. Have a written contract that states exactly what her duties are, and how many hours minimum she will 'work' around the house, for a salary. Her residence in your home is part of the benefits package, and if for any reason, she decides to leave, she's free to do so, but if you 'fire' her, you state in your contract that you will provide her with a rental property amount to get her into the rental home, of modest means. That's her severence package.
Implement a three strikes and your out rule.. If she commits an action that deserves a strike, issue it to her, explain what she did wrong, mark it on a calendar, with red ink, and keep the calendar in a place where she can visually see it every day. If she goes 6 months without receiving another strike, the first strike falls off. If she commits another violation within the 6 months, she gets strike two. And naturally strike three and she's out.
Now, once you've established this 'working' relationship for a matter of no less than two years, and you are somewhat compatible, you may decide to open up the conversation about having children with her. She will probably be the one wanting that before then anyway. Tell her that the only way you'd consider it, is if she would sign a surrogacy agreement, giving you sole custody of the child, that if she left or was fired, she would have no claim to the child(ren), and would be subject to the above employment contractual rules.
In return, she would be allowed to continue to be the child's 'nanny', for so long as mutual employment conditions were met.
I posited this idea before two American Lawyers. One whom spent a large portion of his career as a circuit court Judge, and the other whom has been a lawyer for 50 years, doing divorces and adoptions. The judge lawyer (who specializes in Divorce), shook his head and said that I'm always looking for a way to protect myself, he then said that I may have found such a way, then left my presence (I upset him, as I was threatening to break his rice bowl). The other lawyer felt like a judge would have the opinion that I was attempting to 'game the system', and the contract would be null and void, simply because it removes HIS authority to rule on the matter, should she ever decide to petition for custody.
Prenups have exactly the same problem. There are certain things that a couple cannot decide themselves on prior to marriage, such as child support, and custody times. It is illegal to do such.
So, bottom line, there is no way to protect yourself from being financially raped and your children legally kidnapped from you, by the gynocentric state, should a woman decide to call them to arms on her behalf.
MGTOW is the only way to ever right this ship, if it can even happen. MGTOW is a peaceful, passive, resistance to the gynocentric zeitgeist in the west. And all this, maintaining frame, gaming women, and such, is just giving women attention that they crave. Only when the majority of men, OPT OUT, will women collectively demand that things change, in hopes to call us back to the plantation.
Me personally, I'm out till three things change (so that means I'm probably going to die of old age before these conditions are met). 1. No fault divorce is deemed unconstitutional, or the state is taken completely out of the governing over relationships all together. 2. The end of the federally supported welfare state. 3. Universal suffrage is eliminated, in favor of a merit based election system.
Living trusts don't provide any asset protection; it would need to be an irrevocable trust, which unfortunately incurs gift tax when you contribute to it. The best asset protection vehicles are partnerships or LLPs with more than one member. In common law courts judges can't break up partnerships to serve creditors, and in Alaska even charging orders to grab the distributions are illegal. The next best move is to buy a house in Florida when the shit hits the fan. You can even do this after you get served with a lawsuit since such a transfer is exempt from fraudulent conveyance laws.
You are describing the current situation. If MGTOW is to be a sustainable, permanent solution, then we need to figure out shit. Not say "oh, but there are will people who will do that regardless" and rely on that solely.
MGTOW will go down the shitter if it's not forged into a sustainable philosophy. Trust me.
It has a lot of value as a philosophy. It will be sad if we allow it to die.
homebrandrules... Turd Flinging Monkey and DDJ at Misandry Today is who I'm closely affiliated with, but I like huMAN, Marcus at the Metaphysics of MGTOW, and Big John at the society for men's Freedom.
As a man you'll always have risk. Only women have the possibility of a risk-free life.
Just be glad you no longer have to go to war against rival tribes wearing only your underwear and armed with a spear. You don't have to fight off dangerous predators either.
Men are always the first to do anything (Climb Everest, circumnavigate the globe, first to North pole, first powered flight, first to the moon, etc) because men take risks.
My problem with MGTOW is that they avoid risks instead of minimising them. 98% of MGTOW know that they want a relationship with a woman, but they're too risk-avoidant and would rather not put in the work to minimise the risks of an LTR or having children. A lot of them are out the game not because they don't want to play, but because they can't be bothered to get good at it.
V Varrin Relationships are hard, living with another can also be brutal. They always have been. We fool ourselves thinking our grandparents and beyond had it figured out...she was over salting his eggs out of spite because he was snoring all night too, etc. People were miserable then too, you just plowed through it. It was not acceptable to divorce and laws were much tougher.
If 98% of mgtow...I don’t know if it’s that high....especially for those that have been burned in the past, want relationships, marriage, families, then they actually have to organize, get their voices heard nationally, not on you tube, and get the laws changed. Women can threaten divorce on a whim, typically he is the one that gets screwed. No one should have all the power, power corrupts.
But when you suggests working to change the laws, mgtow guys say they are not a movement, they just want to be left alone, etc.
Risk needs to come with equivalent or greater reward. Risk for the sake of risk is retarded. Either increase the value of relationships (which is nearly impossible) or decrease risks of relationship. That's what nearly all family oriented MGTOWs think.
Here's a hint as to how to do the latter, repeal as many laws as possible. Families existed before laws were set up. Laws are unnecessary tyranny.
I did some research into this topic before and Denmark is one of the places that has shared custody upon divorce but I cannot reliably say that it is 100% true because most of the legislation is written in Danish and I do not read or speak Danish. The legislation that was written in English stated that shared parenting will be given by law unless one parent is deemed unworthy (I don't know how that procedure works yet) of taking care of the kids. I found this out because my GF (who is Danish) wanted to get married and have kids but I told her we can get married but only if the law protected me, the kids and my resources and Danish law protects the kids with mandatory shared parenting, however, it never mentioned much about resources.
This is a really interesting thought experiment, I’m no fan of marriage either. My ex and I are currently coparenting our kids, living in the same neighborhood with a split week schedule and it seems to be working well so far. So would it work from the start is the question? Often times raising babies and toddlers can feel really overwhelming and confining for young parents (I’m an introvert so I actually enjoyed it lol). So you might not have in-house support on your parenting days but then you would have some days free for work, social, or other commitments. It might be better for both parents in that respect, especially if both are working. You would just have to live by the schedule and not move far away from the other bioparent (and of course this would have to be made explicit in a contract). That’s pretty much the coparenting deal my ex and I have now. Another question is could you find a woman willing to give up her chance for the fairytale and agree to this very logical arrangement and assume the risks of pregnancy? Most women probably will still want the ring and the wedding in exchange for their fertility. I guess I’m glad that this isn’t a question I’ll have to face since I’m old and I’ve already had my kids. Good luck guys.
Best case scenario: leave the country and go to the countries that practice patriarchy. However, that in it of itself has its own sets of risks: worse healthcare, higher crime rate, lower pay, being the outsider, etc. The more influenced the country is by the western systems, the more feminist it becomes.
For the western crowd, Russia and eastern Europe may be the best options available, integration may be rather easy, just learn language and you should fit right in. The most immune to western system are obviously the muslim nations, by converting to their faith, you may enjoy the benefits of becoming the patriarch of the family. However, the population is very superstitious and the economy and the governing bodies are not stable. Their guardian system is pretty solid, all things considered. I mean, their growth rate is one of the biggest on the planet.
Here's very simple chart - the more restricted women are, the more children you can expect to have in the family. However, the more restricted women are, the more likely the country has third world economy. My theory is that the more prosperous the system becomes the more leisure time the inhabitants have to think of retarded socialist programs. That's why west is overwhelmingly cucked and regurgitates the feminist dogma.
Move to Sweden, I live in Sweden and here you have shared custody automatic, you dont have to pay anything for the mother if the child lives with the father as well, and in case you have to pay something because the mother has full custody is about 130 euros fixed price is you cant pay the government pays it for you
One option to consider would be to find a woman who already has a child and shared custody 50:50 with the father. You already have data to show she is fair. Of course this comes with the risk that she wouldn’t be as fair with you ( I believe that risk is low ) and you have to tread the single mother waters. It’s a roll of the dice but that’s the only option i see for you. Good luck.
will you ever post a video about how your divorce went? like did you get divorce raped? did she get custody? child support? did she fuck uou over bad? or did you sonehow get lucky and you guys earned equal income, or she made more so you didnt get fucked as bad?
There is no safe way. Even if you eliminate the risk from the female mate, your child will be indoctrinated 24/7 by lunatic liberal indoctrination-education at all levels, the leftie media and depraved entertainment industry. Your child will be a potential liability. Having offspring only drags you into the liberal meat grinder. Society has been destroyed by liberalism. go ahead and breed if you must. But you have been warned.
Cult Film Collective and the Trylon team-up for a can’t miss for film fans Pedro Almodóvar 35mm Double Feature. [TIX] First Ave is insane this week, including the annual Rebel Rebel: Rock for Pussy David Bowie covers benefit for Feline… Continue Reading →
Quick Q+A: George McConnell + SUPERHERO.
As Captain America says in the under-appreciated Age of Ultron, “We have an enhanced in the field.” Not just the field, Cap. Everywhere you look these days Superheroes are flying or speeding or stretching by—in our films, in our art,… Continue Reading →
Whiz Bang Days Celebration.
Bird Town (as we know it) aka Robbinsdale (as you maybe know it) has a proud history of wrasslin’, so we shouldn’t be so surprised to see the high flyin’ brawlers and knuckle sandwich makers and #1 heel Darin Corbin… Continue Reading →
Sat // The Beer & Bacon Classic.
Previous beer fest experiences (and there have been many) indicate the snacklace is reaching an all-time high in sophistication—but you’ll want to leave it at home for this one. Consider it research for your next creation: the Bacon and Beer… Continue Reading →
Bell Museum Grand Opening.
The Bell Museum celebrates nearly 150 years of existence, 50 years of active learning programs, and 24 feet of woolly mammoth at its grand opening this weekend, which welcomes the public to experience its beautifully grandiose new digs in St…. Continue Reading →
Lumières Françaises + Bastile Day.
Did the MSP Film Society know France would be on the cusp of a World Cup win when they planned their week of independent French film? DID THEY? The smarties actually likely scheduled Lumières Françaises to coincide with Sat’s Bastille… Continue Reading →
Weds // TV Girl + Infinity Crush + Cheap Fantasy.
“Here in New York you don’t need excuses to dress like a girl.” The effortless hipster cool of TV Girl’s sound mixes a sunny produced pop, throwback to ’60s French yé-yé, with more relaxed late night beats and samples, making them… Continue Reading →
Thurs // The Summit Ratskeller’s Grand Reopening.